Guide 007 Industrial Cleaning Ultrasonics

Ultrasonic Cleaning: Chemistry That Helps Cavitation

Low-foam surfactants, builders and chelators, temperature and degassing, plus filtration strategy — the chemistry levers that keep cavitation effective and results consistent.

cavitation low foam parts washing filtration

How to use this guide

Ultrasonic cleaning performance is not only about the machine (frequency, power, tank design). Chemistry and bath management often decide whether cavitation reaches the part surface consistently. This guide helps B2B teams align procurement, EHS, and operations around: selection criteria, acceptance checks, bath monitoring, and troubleshooting signals.

Commercial note

If you’re fighting inconsistent results, the fastest ROI typically comes from tightening bath concentration control, degassing routine, and filtration/soil removal— not from buying higher-power ultrasonics. A stable process reduces scrap, rework, and chemical overuse.

What cavitation “needs” from chemistry

Cavitation is the formation and collapse of microscopic bubbles near the part surface. Chemistry can help cavitation by: reducing surface tension (better wetting), minimizing stable foam, keeping soils dispersed (so they don’t redeposit), and controlling water hardness (so builders/chelators keep performance stable). Chemistry can also hurt cavitation if it creates persistent foam or traps air.

Where it fits (process mapping)

  • Process goal: define your KPI (cleanliness level, cosmetic appearance, particle count, cycle time, or cost per part).
  • Operating window: temperature, dwell time, ultrasonic frequency/power, agitation, and loading density (basket design).
  • Soil profile: oils/grease, polishing compounds, carbon, coolants, salts, fingerprints, fine particles.
  • Substrates: steels/cast iron, aluminum, copper alloys, titanium, plastics, elastomers, coated parts.
  • Constraints: discharge limits, odor/VOC policy, aluminum-safe requirement, downstream coating/painting compatibility.

Key decision factors

Fast selection questions

  • Is the soil mostly oil/grease or particulate/inorganic (polishing rouge, salts, oxides, scale)?
  • Do you require low-foam under ultrasonics? (most lines do)
  • Is the part aluminum- or copper-alloy sensitive? (inhibitors and pH window matter)
  • What rinse quality is available? (hard water drives spotting and residue if chelation is weak)
  • How will you remove soils from the bath? (filtration, skimming, overflow, carbon, or dump frequency)

Chemistry toolbox (what each component does)

Most ultrasonic cleaners are blends. You can qualify a product faster if you know which component is doing the heavy lifting. Below is a practical view of common building blocks and what they influence.

1) Low-foam surfactants & wetting agents

Surfactants improve wetting and lift oily soils. In ultrasonics, low-foam behavior is critical because stable foam and entrained air absorb ultrasonic energy and reduce cavitation at the part surface.

  • What it improves: wetting, oil removal, penetration into crevices, soil dispersion
  • What can go wrong: too much foam, poor rinsing, residue if not balanced with builders and rinse strategy
  • What to specify: low-foam performance at your temperature and agitation/ultrasonic power; rinsability expectations

2) Builders (alkalinity control)

Builders provide alkalinity to saponify and help detach oils and soils. They also support surfactant performance. The right alkalinity depends on soil type and metal sensitivity.

  • What it improves: oily soil removal, general cleaning power, bath buffering (stability)
  • Watch-outs: overly aggressive alkalinity can attack aluminum/zinc and dull surfaces; may increase spotting if rinse water is hard
  • What to specify: working pH range, aluminum-safe requirement, compatibility with downstream finishing/coating

3) Chelators / sequestrants (hardness & metal ion control)

Hard water ions (Ca/Mg) reduce cleaning efficiency and increase spotting. Chelators bind these ions so surfactants and builders can work properly. They also help prevent scale/soap scum in the bath and on parts.

  • What it improves: stability with hard water, reduced spotting, less bath scale, better consistency over time
  • Watch-outs: chelator choice affects wastewater treatment considerations; ensure compatibility with site discharge policies
  • What to specify: expected water hardness, tolerance window, and whether RO/DI rinse is available

4) Corrosion inhibitors (flash rust control)

Flash rust often appears when clean steel parts leave the bath and are exposed to water/oxygen before drying. Inhibitors reduce rust risk during and immediately after cleaning, especially with time-to-dry delays.

  • What it improves: reduced flash rust, better short-term protection between clean and dry
  • Watch-outs: some inhibitors can interfere with coating/painting; always validate with downstream requirements
  • What to specify: substrate list (steel, cast iron, aluminum), time-to-dry conditions, downstream paint/coating constraint

5) Solvent boosters (limited use, process-dependent)

Some systems use water-compatible solvents to boost degreasing. In ultrasonics, choose boosters that remain low-foam and are acceptable under EHS/VOC constraints.

  • What it improves: heavy grease removal, faster cycles on stubborn soils
  • Watch-outs: VOC/odor, flammability classification, elastomer/plastic compatibility
  • What to specify: site EHS constraints, allowable VOC/odor, material compatibility list

6) Defoamers / air-release agents

If the chemistry inherently foams under ultrasonics, a defoamer may help, but it’s not always the best fix. In many cases, selecting a naturally low-foam surfactant package is more stable.

  • What it improves: foam control, more stable cavitation
  • Watch-outs: overdosing can cause surface defects or reduce wetting; can deposit on parts if misapplied
  • What to specify: compatibility with your surfactant package and downstream cleanliness requirements

Bath management that protects cavitation

Temperature

Temperature affects viscosity, wetting, soil solubility, and foam behavior. Most ultrasonic processes have an effective temperature window: too cold reduces cleaning power; too hot can increase evaporation, odor, and sometimes foam.

Degassing (often overlooked)

Freshly filled baths contain dissolved gases that dampen cavitation. A standard best practice is to run heat + ultrasonics without parts after fill or major top-up until cavitation stabilizes. (Exact time depends on tank size, power, and temperature.)

Filtration & soil removal

Ultrasonic baths can clean very effectively—but that means soils end up in the bath. If you don’t remove them, they can redeposit, create spotting, and suppress cavitation (especially with oils and fines).

  • Particulate control: use side-stream filtration (bag/cartridge) matched to your soil size distribution.
  • Oil control: consider skimming or coalescing side-stream separation if oil load is high.
  • Bath turnover strategy: define dump/refresh schedule based on soil loading, not calendar alone.

A practical monitoring set (pick 3–5)

  • Concentration: refractometer or titration (method depends on chemistry)
  • pH: quick drift indicator
  • Conductivity: useful when salts/drag-in are a concern
  • Foam level: visual + operator feedback during ultrasonics
  • Bath appearance: oil sheen, haze, sludge, odor (early warning)
  • Filter pressure drop: indicates loading and when to change media

Specification & acceptance checks

Ultrasonic lines are sensitive to batch variability and supplier changes. Procurement specs should be method-defined so receiving can verify.

  • Identity: product name, grade, manufacturer, and batch/lot traceability.
  • Quality (COA): appearance, concentration/assay, density, pH (as supplied), viscosity (if relevant).
  • Performance claims: low-foam behavior under ultrasonics at working temperature; rinsability; corrosion protection claims (if needed).
  • Compatibility: metals/plastics/elastomers list; aluminum-safe statement where required; downstream coating/painting constraint.
  • Safety: current SDS revision, PPE, storage constraints, and disposal guidance.
  • Packaging: drum/IBC, closures, liners, label language, and palletization.
  • Logistics: lead time, Incoterms, shelf life, storage temperature range.

Procurement-ready qualifier for alternatives

Request: SDS, TDS, COA with test methods, and a change-control statement (how you’ll be notified about formulation/site changes). This speeds internal approvals and reduces trial risk.

Handling & storage

  • Store in original sealed packaging, away from incompatibles; protect from heat/freezing per SDS/TDS.
  • Use secondary containment and clear labeling at point of use.
  • For transfers: verify pump/hose compatibility and train for spill control and exposure management.
  • Prevent contamination: keep lids closed and avoid mixing tools used for other chemicals.

Troubleshooting signals

High foaming / poor cavitation consistency

  • Check first: surfactant package (too foamy), over-concentration, water quality, air entrainment, insufficient degassing.
  • Common root causes: using a general-purpose detergent not designed for ultrasonics; high agitation + low-foam mismatch.
  • Actions: verify concentration; add a degassing step; switch to an ultrasonic-grade low-foam cleaner; validate defoamer compatibility if used.

Flash rust after cleaning

  • Check first: pH and concentration, inhibitor package, rinse water quality, time-to-dry, and drying efficiency.
  • Common root causes: diluted chemistry, hard-water rinse leaving residues, slow drying, high humidity.
  • Actions: restore concentration; adjust inhibitor strategy; improve rinse (RO/DI if possible); accelerate drying (air knives, warm air, spin, etc.).

Residue / spotting

  • Check first: water hardness, chelation strength, bath contamination, rinse stage design, drying.
  • Common root causes: hard-water minerals, redeposition from overloaded bath, oily film from poor oil control.
  • Actions: improve filtration and bath turnover; enhance chelation; upgrade rinse quality; add overflow/skim strategy for oils.

If you share your soil type, part materials, bath temperature, concentration control method, and rinse water quality, we can propose a chemistry + filtration approach and supply-ready options with SDS/COA expectations.

RFQ notes (what to include)

  • Soil description (oils/grease, polishing compounds, carbon, salts, particles) and contamination load (low/medium/high).
  • Substrates and restrictions (aluminum safe, copper alloy safe, plastics/elastomers in contact).
  • Process parameters (temperature, dwell time, ultrasonic frequency/power, basket/loading density).
  • Rinse setup (number of rinses, water source: city/softened/RO/DI) and drying method.
  • Target KPI (cycle time, cleanliness standard, cosmetic level, reject rate reduction).
  • Monthly volume, packaging preference, delivery location and compliance requirements.

FAQ

Do higher temperatures always clean better?

Not always. Higher temperature reduces viscosity and can improve degreasing, but it can also increase evaporation, odor, and sometimes foam. Use the supplier’s recommended operating window and validate against your rinse/dry constraints.

Is low foam always required?

For most ultrasonic baths, yes—because stable foam and entrained air dampen cavitation. Even “moderate” foam can reduce consistency, especially with high power density or heavy agitation.

Why does performance drop after a few days?

Usually because the bath becomes a “soil reservoir”: oils, fines, and dissolved salts build up, reducing wetting and promoting redeposition. Filtration, skimming/oil control, concentration control, and planned bath refresh restore stability.


Educational content only. Always follow site EHS rules and the supplier SDS for safe use. Actual performance depends on your soil type, substrate, equipment, and bath management; validate changes through controlled trials.