Guide 018 Food & Beverage Processing CIP / COP

Sanitizers: QAC vs PAA vs Chlorine

Choosing by organism, surface, and rinse rules.

food sanitation CIP procurement

How to use this guide

This guide helps food & beverage teams align operations, quality, and procurement on sanitizer selection and control. Use it to decide between three common families: QAC (quat), PAA (peracetic acid), and chlorine. Your final choice should always follow the product label, local regulations, and site EHS rules.

Non-negotiable: clean before you sanitize

Sanitizers are not soil removers. If protein/fat/mineral soils remain, sanitizer performance drops and biofilm risk increases. For consistent results: pre-rinse → wash (alkali/acid as needed) → rinse → sanitize → drain/dry.

Where it fits

  • CIP: internal circuits (tanks, lines, fillers, heat exchangers, pumps, valves).
  • COP / open plant sanitation: external surfaces, conveyors, utensils, floors/walls (where allowed).
  • Post-clean verification: ATP, micro swabs, visual checks, concentration tests, contact time logging.
  • Risk areas: dead legs, gaskets/seat areas, spray balls with poor coverage, low-flow zones, and warm wet environments.

Key decision factors

  • Organism pressure: routine flora vs persistent issues (yeasts/molds, biofilm formers).
  • Surface & material: stainless grade, elastomers (EPDM/NBR/Viton), plastics, aluminum, mild steel.
  • Process limits: no-rinse vs rinse-required programs, odor constraints, and wastewater treatment sensitivity.
  • Water quality: hardness, temperature, and organic load (how “dirty” the system is when sanitizer hits it).
  • Application: spray/foam/immersion/CIP circulation; coverage reliability matters as much as chemistry.
  • Control method: test strips/titration/ORP/chlorine analyzers; how you’ll prove concentration.

At-a-glance comparison

Decision snapshot

  • QAC: great for many non-food contact and some controlled food-contact applications; residual activity; can foam; can be deactivated by some cleaners/soils.
  • PAA: strong oxidizer with broad use in industrial sanitation; effective at low contact times; low residue; odor and material compatibility must be managed.
  • Chlorine: strong, cost-effective oxidizer; sensitive to pH and organic load; corrosion and byproduct concerns; mixing hazards are critical.
Topic QAC (Quat) PAA (Peracetic Acid) Chlorine (Hypochlorite)
Strengths Good surface sanitizer; some residual action; often low odor; can be gentle on many surfaces. Fast action; works well across many conditions; breaks down to simple residues; common for CIP and open plant when controlled. Strong oxidizer; economical; widely used where conditions and materials allow.
Common limits Can be reduced by soils and some chemistry; can leave residues; foam risk; incompatibility with anionic surfactants. Strong odor; oxidizer safety; can stress some elastomers/metals over time; needs ventilation. Corrosive, especially if mismanaged; performance depends strongly on pH and load; may create odor/irritation; mixing hazards.
Best fit Environmental sanitation, non-porous surfaces, footbaths/entry mats (site-specific), controlled programs where residue is acceptable. CIP final sanitize, fillers, lines, beverage plants, biofilm control programs (with verified cleaning). Selected open-plant and some CIP steps where pH and materials are compatible; shock sanitation under strict control.
Verification Concentration checks via product method; ensure correct dilution and contact time. Concentration via supplier method; monitor odor/ventilation and ensure stable dosing. Free available chlorine monitoring; tight control of dilution and pH; confirm contact time.

Selection by use case

1) CIP final sanitize (closed circuits)

  • Most common driver: consistent kill with low residue and predictable verification.
  • Typical preference: PAA (especially when rinse rules and residue limits are strict).
  • Watch-outs: gasket compatibility, ventilation, and dosing stability (especially with automated injection).

2) Fillers, packaging halls, and high-risk zones

  • Most common driver: biofilm prevention and rapid turnaround.
  • Typical preference: PAA for targeted programs; chlorine where allowed and controlled; QAC in specific environmental programs (site and label dependent).
  • Watch-outs: aerosol exposure and corrosion (chlorine), surface residue (QAC), odor/irritation (PAA).

3) Floors, drains, and environmental sanitation

  • Most common driver: cost, foaming method, and compatibility with the cleaning routine.
  • Typical preference: QAC or chlorine depending on site program; oxidizers are often used for “periodic reset.”
  • Watch-outs: don’t mix with acids; manage runoff to wastewater treatment; validate against drain biofilms with a cleaning plan (not sanitizer-only).

4) Equipment exteriors and hand-contact surfaces

  • Most common driver: surface safety, residue, and frequency of use.
  • Typical preference: product-label-driven choices; often lower-odor options for frequent wipe-downs.
  • Watch-outs: residue buildup that attracts soils; “sticky” surfaces; transfer risk if used on food-contact surfaces without approved no-rinse conditions.

Rinse / no-rinse rules (what operations must lock down)

The same chemical family can have products with different approvals and instructions. For each area in your plant, define:

  • Food-contact vs non-food-contact: separate SOPs and color-coded tools where possible.
  • No-rinse conditions: if allowed, define the concentration window, required drain time, and any post-sanitize checks.
  • Rinse-required programs: define rinse water quality, rinse endpoint (conductivity/visual), and how you avoid recontamination.
  • Allergen & flavor control: sanitize does not remove allergens; cleaning validation must be separate.

Procurement tip

Don’t buy by “chemical name” alone. Buy by registered/labelled product (or compliant equivalent), with the exact use directions your auditors will expect: dilution method, contact time, rinse statement, and allowed surfaces.

Compatibility & safety pitfalls (avoid expensive incidents)

Mixing hazards

  • Never mix chlorine products with acids or ammonia-containing products. Dangerous gases can form.
  • Do not blend oxidizers (chlorine / PAA) with other chemicals unless the label explicitly allows it.
  • Sequence matters: fully rinse between incompatible steps if your CIP includes acid washes and chlorine steps.

Materials of construction (practical notes)

  • Stainless steel: generally robust, but corrosion risk rises with poor control, high concentration, heat, or stagnant conditions (especially for chlorine).
  • Elastomers: oxidizers can shorten life; validate gasket types in your equipment manuals and track seal failures as an early warning.
  • Aluminum/mild steel: often problematic with oxidizers; treat as high-risk unless you have a proven program.
  • Plastics: compatibility varies; request supplier guidance for your polymers (PVC, PP, PE, PTFE, etc.).

Process control: making sanitation predictable

Performance failures usually come from concentration drift, short contact time, poor coverage, or soil carryover. Build a control plan like you would for a critical process chemical.

Minimum control elements

  • Standard dilution method: fixed-volume dosing, venturi injector, or metering pump—avoid “glug-and-guess.”
  • Verification method: choose one (strips/titration/analyzer) and train it. Define pass/fail windows.
  • Contact time proof: timers, CIP recipe logs, and flow confirmation (low-flow zones are common misses).
  • Coverage checks: spray pattern checks, shadow zone mapping, and periodic teardown inspection.
  • Recordkeeping: lot/batch traceability for sanitizer + daily checks for concentration and temperature.

Stability & dosing reliability

  • PAA and chlorine: oxidizers can lose strength over time depending on storage conditions; treat COA and storage as part of quality.
  • QAC: concentrate is often stable, but field dilution mistakes are common; simplify the dilution process.
  • Automated dosing: specify pump materials and calibration interval; add a simple “daily verification” step.

Specification & acceptance checks (procurement-ready)

When comparing products, ask for the data you can verify on receipt and during audits:

  • Identity: product name, grade, manufacturer, and batch/lot traceability (COA must match delivered lot).
  • Active content: assay/strength on COA (and method), plus any stabilizer notes if relevant.
  • Documentation: up-to-date SDS; technical sheet with dilution, contact time, rinse statement, and allowed surfaces.
  • Packaging: drum/IBC/bulk; material compatibility (HDPE is common); closures/venting as required; tamper seals; correct labeling.
  • Shelf life & storage: temperature window, sunlight/heat restrictions, first-in-first-out plan, and transport classification.
  • Odor & handling: ventilation requirements, PPE guidance, and spill neutralization basics (site-specific).
  • Supply readiness: lead time, Incoterms, routine availability, and support for audits (SDS/COA history).

Handling & storage (EHS-friendly basics)

  • Store in original sealed packaging, segregated from incompatible chemicals.
  • Use secondary containment, clear labeling, and dedicated transfer equipment.
  • Control temperature per supplier guidance; avoid heat and direct sun for oxidizers.
  • Train operators on dilution order (water first, then chemical if applicable), and on “never mix chemicals” rules.

Troubleshooting signals (what to check first)

If sanitation performance drops, these are common early indicators and high-probability causes:

  • ATP/micro failures after sanitation: cleaning step insufficient; soil carryover; dead legs; short contact time.
  • Odor carryover / off-notes: residue buildup; poor rinse practice; wrong product for the surface.
  • Foam overflow in CIP return: incompatible product choice, over-dosing, air entrainment, or interaction with cleaners.
  • Corrosion spots / gasket swelling: oxidizer overuse, stagnant exposure, wrong materials, or poor neutralization/rinsing sequence.
  • High chemical consumption: dilution errors, leaking injectors, wrong concentration targets, or excessive blowdown to drains.

Share your current sanitizer family, cleaning sequence, contact time, verification method, and a few recent results. We can usually narrow down the failure mode quickly.

RFQ notes (what to include)

  • Application: CIP/COP, equipment type, and whether surfaces are food-contact or environmental.
  • Soils: protein/fat/mineral profile; whether you run acid steps; any known hard water issues.
  • Targets: organism pressure, turnaround time, odor constraints, and rinse/no-rinse requirements.
  • Materials: stainless grade and elastomers (gasket/seat types) in contact.
  • Controls: how you will verify concentration (strips/titration/analyzer) and log contact time.
  • Volumes: estimated monthly usage, packaging preference (drum/IBC), and delivery destination.
  • Documentation: SDS + COA per lot; audit support needs; any site-specific compliance requirements.

Need a compliant sanitizer program (not just a product)?

Send your cleaning sequence (alkali/acid), the area (CIP vs open plant), rinse rules, and your verification method. We’ll propose options with procurement-ready specs and a simple control plan (dilution + verification + troubleshooting cues).


Educational content only. Always follow site EHS rules and the supplier label/SDS for safe use. Do not mix chemicals. Validate compatibility and performance under your process conditions.