How to use this guide
This page is a practical decision aid for brewery operations, QA/QC, maintenance, and procurement teams. Use it to align on cleaning objectives, selection criteria, acceptance checks, and monitoring signals so you can buy the right chemistry and prove it works on your lines.
Commercial note
We support industrial chemical sourcing and supply coordination for food & beverage sites. If you share your equipment list, water profile, CIP parameters, and compliance constraints, we can propose procurement-ready options (product spec, SDS/COA expectations, packaging, lead time) and help you compare offers on a like-for-like basis.
Quick navigation
- Where it fits in brewery CIP
- Soil map: what you are removing
- Caustic cleaning (organic soils)
- Acid cleaning & descaling (inorganic soils)
- Beerstone / stone control strategy
- Sanitizing after cleaning
- Dosing, control & verification
- Materials compatibility basics
- Troubleshooting signals & root causes
- Specification, acceptance checks & RFQ notes
Where it fits in brewery CIP
CIP performance is not just “stronger chemical.” It is the combined effect of time, temperature, chemical concentration, and mechanical action (flow, turbulence, impingement). Your job is to select chemistry that delivers results inside your operating window — without damaging materials or creating downstream issues (foam, carryover, wastewater load).
- Typical circuits: fermenters/brite tanks, heat exchangers, hoses, fillers, keg washers, transfer lines.
- Key interfaces: stainless steel, elastomer seals, plastics, sight-glass, spray balls, pumps, instrumentation.
- Constraints to capture early: food-contact policy, site EHS rules, discharge limits, water availability, and downtime window.
Soil map: what you are removing
Correct chemistry depends on soil type. Brewery soils are commonly a blend, but one usually dominates:
| Soil type | Where it shows up | Best chemistry lever | Common symptom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organic (proteins, carbohydrates, biofilm) | fermenters, lines, fillers | alkalinity + surfactant + heat + flow | haze/odor carryover, ATP failures |
| Oils/fats (lubricants, handling residues) | packaging, conveyors, some lines | low-foam wetting/emulsification | patchy wetting, “water breaks” |
| Inorganic scale (carbonates, silicates) | heat exchangers, boilers, hot loops | acid + chelation + controlled contact time | heat transfer loss, pressure drop |
| Beerstone (often calcium oxalate + organics) | tanks, stones, fittings, fillers | acid selection + frequency + prevention | rough deposits, micro harborage points |
Caustic cleaning (organic soils)
Purpose: remove organics (proteins, carbohydrates, biofilm), dissolve and lift soils, and leave surfaces “chemically clean” before any sanitizing step.
What a brewery caustic CIP detergent is (beyond NaOH)
- Alkalinity source: typically sodium hydroxide (caustic soda) and/or alkali builders. Higher alkalinity improves soil removal but increases burn risk and compatibility constraints.
- Low-foam surfactants: improve wetting and soil lift at turbulent flow, reduce “shadow” areas.
- Sequestrants/chelants: bind hardness ions and stabilize performance in hard water (helps prevent redeposition and protects heat-exchanger surfaces).
- Dispersants: keep loosened soils suspended so they rinse out.
- Optional additives: antifoam (for return line control), corrosion inhibitors (application-dependent), and color/indicator systems (site preference).
Performance drivers you can measure
- Concentration control: titration or calibrated conductivity setpoints (don’t “guess by feel”).
- Temperature: higher temperature generally improves organic soil removal, but can accelerate gasket wear and increase vapor risk.
- Flow/turbulence: validate spray device coverage and line velocity; chemistry cannot compensate for poor mechanical action.
- Contact time: enough time to dissolve and lift soils, but not so long that it creates unnecessary corrosion exposure or downtime.
Typical operating ranges (site-specific validation required)
The ranges below are common starting points; confirm with your OEM guidance, plant EHS rules, and supplier technical data.
- Caustic CIP wash: typically in the low single-digit % range, with warm-to-hot circulation depending on equipment and soils.
- Low-foam requirement: critical for return line stability, pumps, and accurate conductivity readings.
- Rinse quality: final rinse quality and volume strongly affect carryover risk and foam in the next step.
Common pitfalls
- Foam overflow: usually too much surfactant for the circuit, air ingress, or poor return design. Fix foam at the formulation/control level rather than “running faster.”
- Patchy cleaning / shadowing: mechanical coverage issue (spray device, flow, dead legs), not chemistry strength.
- Alkaline carryover into acid step: consumes acid, reduces descaling efficiency, can cause precipitation and rough films.
Acid cleaning & descaling (inorganic soils)
Purpose: remove mineral scale, neutralize alkaline films, and manage beerstone/stone formation. Acid programs are usually either periodic (e.g., weekly/biweekly) or triggered (based on heat exchanger performance, visual deposits, or verification results).
Acid options and what they are good at
- Phosphoric-based: strong on mineral films; often used in blends. Can help brighten stainless when used correctly.
- Nitric-based: effective descaler; can support passivation-related outcomes in some regimes, but requires careful EHS controls and compatibility checks.
- Organic acids (selected applications): used where milder handling profile is desired; effectiveness depends heavily on deposits and temperature.
- Chelated acid blends: combine acidity with chelation to lift complex deposits and improve performance in hard-water conditions.
Descaling and heat exchanger uptime
Heat exchanger fouling often shows up as reduced heat transfer, higher pressure drop, or longer cooldown time. For procurement, define the KPI you care about (e.g., “restore ΔT performance” or “reduce pressure drop back to baseline”) and validate before/after.
Acid step basics (process logic)
- Always rinse between caustic and acid: reduces neutralization losses and prevents precipitation.
- Control concentration: titration (preferred) or verified conductivity methods (if validated for your blend).
- Temperature matters: warm circulation often improves scale removal, but do not exceed equipment limits.
- Rinse to endpoint: confirm rinse endpoint (pH/conductivity) to reduce acid carryover and corrosion risk.
Beerstone / stone control strategy
“Beerstone” is often a composite deposit (commonly calcium oxalate with organics and minerals). It matters because it creates roughness and micro-harborage points that challenge sanitation, increase contamination risk, and can accelerate performance loss in fittings and valves.
Control is frequency + water chemistry + formulation
- Frequency: a perfectly chosen acid used too rarely still loses. Define an interval based on your production profile and verification signals.
- Water profile: hardness and alkalinity drive scale risk. If your incoming water varies seasonally, your program may need seasonal setpoints.
- Formulation choice: chelated acids and dispersants can improve removal and reduce redeposition, especially on mixed deposits.
- Prevention mindset: preventing heavy deposits is usually cheaper than aggressive “recovery cleans.”
What to send us for a stone-control recommendation
A recent water report (hardness/alkalinity), the equipment list (tanks, HX types), current CIP steps (temps, times, concentrations), and a quick description/photo of deposits. With those, we can propose a practical acid + frequency plan and the right packaging/supply format.
Sanitizing after cleaning
Cleaning removes soils; sanitizing reduces microbial load on already-clean surfaces. Sanitizers can be highly effective, but they are not a substitute for soil removal. For food & beverage environments, select sanitizers based on contact time, temperature, compatibility, and site safety rules.
Common sanitizer families (selection logic)
- Peracetic acid (PAA) blends: widely used for CIP sanitizing; effective at low concentrations with defined contact time; strong odor and corrosion considerations on some metals if misused.
- Chlorine-based systems: strong oxidizers; may have compatibility constraints (especially with some stainless conditions) and require careful control to avoid off-odors and corrosion risks.
- Alternative oxidizers (site-dependent): used where policy and equipment compatibility align.
Always follow supplier SDS, label instructions, and local regulations. Validate sanitizer concentration and contact time with your QA program and equipment OEM guidance.
Dosing, control & verification
The fastest way to improve cleaning outcomes (and reduce chemical spend) is to control concentration and verify outcomes. Aim for a small number of measurable signals that you can trend weekly.
Control tools
- Titration: best for accuracy across blends (caustic and acid). Build a simple titration SOP and keep reagents controlled.
- Conductivity: useful for consistent single-component systems, but must be calibrated/validated for your exact formulation and temperature.
- Temperature logging: validate actual return temperature, not just setpoint.
- Flow/pressure checks: confirm spray device operation and detect fouling in return strainers or HX.
Verification signals (choose 2–3, trend them)
- Visual inspection: especially for beerstone roughness and shadowing.
- ATP swabs: fast hygiene check for organics; compare pre/post and by equipment zone.
- Micro results: environmental swabs in risk zones (filler, bright beer) for contamination control.
- Process performance: HX ΔT and pressure drop; time-to-cool metrics; filler downtime related to deposits.
Materials compatibility basics
Compatibility is not optional. The wrong chemistry (or the right chemistry at the wrong conditions) can shorten seal life, dull surfaces, and create micro-roughness that makes sanitation harder over time.
- Stainless steel: generally robust for many CIP conditions, but sensitivity depends on alloy, temperature, concentration, exposure time, and chloride/oxidizer presence.
- Elastomers (EPDM, NBR, FKM, etc.): can swell or harden depending on pH and temperature; always validate with OEM guidance and supplier compatibility tables.
- Plastics & sight glass: some plastics stress-crack under strong alkali/oxidizers; confirm before switching sanitizer families.
- Mixed metals: avoid galvanic issues; check inhibitor strategy and rinse endpoints.
Troubleshooting signals & common root causes
If performance drops, use this “signal → check first” map before changing suppliers. Most problems are control or mechanics, not chemical identity.
| Signal | Most likely checks | Typical corrective action |
|---|---|---|
| Protein soils not removing | caustic concentration, temperature, flow coverage, contact time | tighten control (titration), verify spray device, adjust time/temp inside limits |
| Odor/haze carryover | rinse endpoint, soil load, sanitizing step applied to dirty surface | improve rinse verification, ensure caustic step actually removes soils |
| Foam overflow in CIP return | surfactant level, air ingress, pump cavitation, return design | use low-foam formulation, fix air leaks, consider antifoam strategy |
| Beerstone reappears quickly | acid frequency too low, water hardness variability, incomplete rinse between steps | increase frequency, consider chelated acid, validate intermediate rinses |
| Heat exchanger performance loss | scale type, acid strength/control, temperature, contact time | optimize descaling step and verification (ΔT/pressure drop), avoid neutralization losses |
Specification, acceptance checks & RFQ notes
For procurement, “equivalent” should mean equivalent performance, compatibility, documentation, and supply reliability — not just “same acid” or “same % NaOH”. Use this section to request data you can actually verify at goods-receipt.
What to specify (so offers are comparable)
- Application: circuit (tanks, HX, fillers, kegs), soil type, and CIP step (caustic wash / acid wash / sanitizer).
- Operating window: concentration range, temperature range, time, and any flow/coverage constraints.
- Water profile: hardness/alkalinity range and whether it varies seasonally.
- Compatibility: key materials (stainless grade if known, elastomers, plastics, coatings).
- Verification: how you will judge success (ATP threshold, micro results, HX metrics, visual standard).
- Site constraints: discharge limits, oxidizer policy, odor constraints, storage limits, forklift handling, and training requirements.
Acceptance checks (what to request and verify)
- Identity & traceability: product name, manufacturer, batch/lot, manufacturing date, shelf life.
- COA (typical items): assay/concentration, density/specific gravity, pH (where relevant), appearance, and any key actives for blended products.
- SDS: current revision date, hazard classification, first aid, PPE guidance, storage and spill response.
- Packaging: drum/IBC/bulk, closure type, liner (if any), palletization details, labeling language.
- Logistics: lead time, Incoterms, minimum order quantity, temperature limits in transit, and storage conditions.
Commercial details that reduce total cost (not just unit price)
- Concentration stability: formulations that maintain performance across water variability reduce rework and downtime.
- Low-foam control: fewer CIP interruptions, less re-circulation loss, and more stable instrumentation readings.
- Packaging fit: right-size drums/IBCs reduce handling time, leftover disposal, and inventory risk.
- Documentation readiness: complete SDS/COA and traceability reduce QA holds and receiving delays.
- Supply continuity: consistent batches and lead times reduce “emergency substitutions” that cause quality risk.
RFQ notes (copy/paste template)
- Target product: caustic CIP detergent / acid descaler / sanitizer (specify which)
- Use case: equipment list + soil type + cleaning frequency
- Operating window: concentration range, temperature range, time, flow/coverage notes
- Materials in contact: stainless, elastomers, plastics (list what you know)
- Verification: ATP/micro/visual + any HX KPIs
- Water profile: hardness/alkalinity (attach report if available)
- Packaging: drum/IBC/bulk + annual volume + delivery location
- Docs required: SDS + COA + traceability details; any site-specific compliance documents
- Commercial: lead time target, Incoterms preference, and any labeling language requirements
Need a compliant alternative or a quote comparison?
Send your current chemistry (names/actives if possible), CIP parameters, water profile, and the problem you want to solve (foam, beerstone, HX performance, carryover, etc.). We can propose options and help normalize offers so you compare on real performance and total cost drivers — not just concentration or drum price.
Educational content only. Always follow site EHS rules, equipment OEM guidance, and the supplier SDS/label instructions. Validate any cleaning change under your QA program before full rollout.